- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
EU-US Privacy Shield pact faces second legal challenge
EurActiv | 3 November 2016
EU-US Privacy Shield pact faces second legal challenge
A new EU-US pact governing the transfer of personal data faces a second legal challenge, putting the details of the deal which underpins billions of dollars of transatlantic trade in digital services under further scrutiny.
French privacy advocacy group La Quadrature du Net, non-profit internet service provider French Data Network and its Federation FDN industry association have now challenged the adoption of the Privacy Shield pact by the European Commission at the Luxembourg-based General Court, following in the steps of Irish group Digital Rights Ireland.
The Privacy Shield agreement was reached earlier this year after the European Union’s highest court struck down the previous Safe Harbour Principles used by companies to enable them to transfer Europeans’ personal data to the United States, due to concerns about intrusive US surveillance of online data.
The new agreement gives businesses storing Europeans’ data on US servers – from human resources information to people’s browsing histories and hotel bookings – an easy way to do so without falling foul of tough EU private data transfer rules.
More than 500 companies have signed up to Privacy Shield so far, including Google, Facebook and Microsoft, while over 1,000 are being processed by the US Department of Commerce.
The agreement seeks to strengthen privacy protections for EU citizens by giving them a means of seeking redress in the case of disputes, including through a new privacy ombudsman within the State Department who will deal with complaints from Europeans about US spying.
But the objectors say that restrictions on US surveillance activities – in particular the bulk collection of data and the purposes for which the data can be used – are inadequate and therefore the Privacy Shield agreement should be annulled.
Under EU law companies or individuals may challenge EU acts before the EU courts if they are directly concerned within two months of the act coming into force, otherwise they have to go through national courts, a process which takes longer.
However both challenges face a strong risk of being declared inadmissible if the court finds that the associations are not directly concerned.
In their challenge the French groups say that the US ombudsman is not an effective mechanism for dealing with complaints.
“The fact that it relies on so-called ‘independent’ instruments is in no way sufficient to consider it an independent judicial entity,” they said.
A spokesman for the European Commission, which negotiated the Privacy Shield with Washington, said it was aware of the new complaint.
“We don’t comment on ongoing court cases. As we have said from the beginning, the Commission is convinced that the Privacy Shield lives up to the requirements set out by the European Court of Justice, which have been the basis for the negotiations,” Christian Wigand said.
The US Department of Commerce did not respond to questions about the second challenge.
News from the movements
21-Apr-2017 Chile Mejor sin TPPSus representantes afirmaron que tratados como el TPP, el TISA y otros acentúan el extractivismo intensivo en uso de agua y atentan contra las decisiones soberanas de los pueblos respecto al medioambiente.
10-Apr-2017 Coalition Nationale "Non aux APE"La Coalition se désole de ce que des citoyens arrivent difficilement à échanger avec les autorités de ce pays sur des questions aussi importantes que les APE et la ZLEC.
7-Apr-2017 Argentina Mejor sin TLCLos pueblos latinoamericanos decimos NO a los Tratados de Libre Comercio ¡Basta de privilegios para las empresas a costa de nuestros derechos!
4-Apr-2017 No al TTIPLa campaña No al TTIP, CETA, TiSA apoya la iniciativa del grupo parlamentario Unidos Podemos – En Comú Podem – En Marea que el Congreso de los Diputados solicite al Tribunal Constitucional un examen sobre si el tratado UE-Canadá viola derechos constitucionales de la ciudadanía tal como se ha hecho en Francia y Alemania.
4-Apr-2017 Forum against FTAsAround 100 representatives of people’s movements from southern Indian states gathered at the Indian Social Institute, Bangalore from 2-3 April to discuss the implications of the proposed mega free trade agreement - Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
1-Apr-2017 The MintAfricans are insisting on actual economic development which is leaving European trade negotiators exasperated. Rick Rowden explains why their stand is historic and right.
30-Mar-2017 La Via CampesinaA workshop is being convened in early April to build collective capacities on trade agreements in general and RCEP in particular. The workshop will be held in Bangalore, a city in South India
29-Mar-2017 Business MirrorMining firms should not resort to international arbitration in forcing the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to revoke its decision to suspend 28 mines and cancel 75 mineral-production sharing agreements.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.