- About
- About bilaterals.org
-
Announcements
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- Help
- How to participate
- Negotiations
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
- Links




Financial regulation challenged by European trade policy
posted 2-October-2018
All the versions of this article: [English] [français]
Financial Watch | 2 October 2018
Financial regulation challenged by European trade policy
On 2 October 2018, the Veblen Institute and Finance Watch published a report on the impact of European trade policy on financial regulation.
Trade agreements currently being negotiated or already approved introduce numerous restrictions over the right of states to regulate, especially in the field of financial regulation, and limits their capacity to react to ensure financial stability. The report draws this conclusion after analysing bilateral agreements already negotiated such as CETA and JEFTA, those still under negotiations or suspended (TTIP), as well as the plurilateral Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).
The very idea of including financial services in these trade agreements, with the specific objective to increase production and exchange volumes in this sector, goes against lessons learned from the last global financial crisis. This inclusion could lead to increased financial risk-taking and facilitate the propagation of future crises, while it at the same time reducing the political space for States to respond to a crisis. In addition, investors will be able to contest financial regulations through the mechanism for regulatory arbitrage between States and investors, and this could stop measures deemed as necessary to maintain financial stability in the future.
Specifically, the report issues warnings against the following provisions contained in these agreements:
- These new trade deals are “living” agreements: once adopted, they can be enlarged through the mechanism of regulatory cooperation, i.e. technical-level dialogues designed to promote the convergence of both parties’ regulation. This offers new lobbying opportunities to representatives of the financial sector. The real impact of these agreements therefore risks moving beyond what was initially intended.
- The negotiation method used is that of a “negative list”: all financial services that are not expressly listed as being excluded from the agreement are by default open to competition. This makes it more difficult to pass future financial services regulation.
- These agreements contain investment protection provisions that could be used to stop States from properly acting if faced with a financial crisis, and in particular from taking preventative measures. States would, for example, be constrained from taking specific measures to limit the size of banks or to ring-fence activities judged to be detrimental, such as high-frequency trading.
- The new agreements also look to limit measures in respect of localisation and storage of financial data for security or access reasons and for monitoring by competent authorities.
The Veblen Institute and Finance Watch propose the following recommendations:
- Ensure transparency and proper democratic control over trade agreements.
- Exclude financial regulation from trade negotiations.
- Rule out the use of the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism.
- Stop using the “negative list” method to grant market access for services.
- Ensure that public services and social security systems are explicitly protected.
- Protect the ability of States to regulate efficiently, in particular to get rid of norms contained in investment chapters whenever they turn out to be incompatible with policy recommendations made by financial regulators or academic research.
- Include a clause in trade agreements to allow States to put in place effective checks on movements of capital when deemed necessary.
- Make trade and services agreements reversible.
Read the report (pdf)
An important European campaign to stop investor-state arbitration (ISDS) has been launched. Please click here to sign the petition and find out how you can get directly involved.
News from the movements
-
12-Feb-2019 Le Monde
« Les droits des investisseurs ne doivent pas être mieux protégés que ceux des citoyens ou de la planète »
27 associations, syndicats et ONG appellent les députés européens à rejeter un projet d’accord commercial entre l’UE et Singapour, comparable au très contesté CETA. -
11-Feb-2019 OMAL
Euskal Herria se planta ante los tratados comerciales
Proponemos una serie de líneas de actuación para que las administraciones vascas hagan frente a los principales dispositivos de los tratados. -
7-Feb-2019 Biodiversidad en América Latina
Tratados de Libre Comercio: Instrumentos de desvío de poder que sojuzgan el Derecho
Este cuaderno de trabajo contiene fragmentos de textos, testimonios y entrevistas para repensar los efectos de los tratados de libre comercio y señalar sus nocivos efectos sobre la soberanía política, social económica y jurídica de las naciones. -
6-Feb-2019 M4
Organizaciones denuncian demanda de compañía minera estadounidense contra Guatemala y expresan su solidaridad con las comunidades que defienden la tierra y la vida en “La Puya”
Nos unimos en solidaridad con los residentes de San Pedro Ayampuc y San José del Golfo, quienes están profundamente preocupados por la grave amenaza que la mina representa para los suministros de agua, los ecosistemas y la calidad de vida en el área. -
6-Feb-2019 Stop ISDS
Sued for existing – ancient Romanian town on the frontline of the battle against ISDS
Today, the 6th of February 2019, the Romanian town of Roşia Montană celebrates its 1888th year of existence. Over the past 20 years, residents have fought against a proposed multi-billion dollar mining project. -
6-Feb-2019 Seattle to Brussels Network
Support the joint letter on the future of ISDS – EU-Singapore IPA vote
Civil society organisations urge Member of the European Parliament to not ratify EU - Singapore Investment Protection Agreement -
28-Jan-2019 Via Campesina
Democracy instead of corporate power. Food sovereignty instead of free trade
Representatives from 17 farmer organizations from 7 European countries gathered here to denounce the EU’s current trade agenda. -
28-Jan-2019 Via Campesina
Democracia en lugar de poder corporativo. Soberanía alimentaria en lugar de libre comercio
Representantes de 17 organizaciones de agricultores de 7 países europeos se reunieron aquí para denunciar la actual agenda comercial de la UE.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.
Comment on this article