- About
- About bilaterals.org
-
Announcements
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- Help
- How to participate
- Negotiations
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
- Links
Vietnam proposes amendments to stalled TPP trade deal at Sydney talks: sources
posted 29-August-2017

- Vietnam’s desire to shelve the IP provisions around pharmaceutical data is likely to win broad support.
Reuters | 29 Aug 2017
Vietnam proposes amendments to stalled TPP trade deal at Sydney talks: sources
Officials from 11 of the 12 countries that committed to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal are meeting in Sydney for talks to re-energize the stalled agreement and discuss amendmends to the pact following the withdrawal of the U.S.
Among the areas being discussed, Vietnam has raised the prospect of changes to labor rights and intellectual property (IP) provisions in the original pact, one source familiar with the talks told Reuters.
While no agreement is expected at the end of the three-day meeting, Vietnam’s desire to shelve the IP provisions around pharmaceutical data is likely to win broad support, with Japanese and New Zealand officials also indicating their support for the change, sources familiar with the talks told Reuters.
The original TPP agreement was seen as particularly onerous on Vietnam, which would have been forced to make significant reforms, analysts said.
"There’s not much sense to agree to provisions they don’t really want such as stronger monopolies on medicines if they are not going to get access to the U.S. market," said Patricia Ranald, a research associate at the University of Sydney.
The original TPP offered an eight-year window before competitors could gain access to proprietary pharmaceutical data, which critics said would impede development of cheap generics.
Potential amendments, however, require delicate positioning.
Vietnam was one of the countries expected to enjoy the biggest economic benefits from the TPP through greater access to the U.S. market.
However, the original 12-member TPP, which aimed to cut trade barriers in some of Asia’s fastest-growing economies, was thrown into limbo in January when U.S. President Trump withdrew from the agreement.
Trump’s move fulfilled a campaign pledge to put "America first" - a policy that aimed to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.
Although the remaining members have publicly said they remain committed to the deal, implementation of the agreement linking 11 countries with a combined GDP of $12.4 trillion has stalled - raising fears that other countries will follow the U.S. lead and withdraw.
Eager to keep all members onboard, representatives from the remaining countries are considering changes to the original TPP deal, three sources familiar with the talks said.
"We’re all open to evaluating what we can do and what viable alternatives there may be," Edgar Vasquez, Peru’s deputy trade minister, told Reuters.
While Trump has said he will not change his mind on the TPP, the remaining members are hopeful a future U.S. president will commit to the agreement, a cornerstone of former President Barack Obama’s pivot to Asia.
But analysts said wholesale changes, while ensuring the support of smaller members, would repel the U.S.
"The more you change the agreement, it is going to be harder to get the U.S. to sign on when it is ready to," said Shiro Armstrong, research fellow at the Crawford School of Economics in Canberra.
News from the movements
-
25-Oct-2018 War on Want et al
The Trans-Pacific Powergrab: Why joining the TPP would be bad for people and planet – and the UK
New briefing from War on Want, Global Justice Now and Trade Justice Movement UK -
24-Oct-2018 Webmanagercenter
Tunisie-UE : Attention aux vices cachés !
“Méfiez-vous“, l’Accord de libre-échange avec l’UE est “complet, approfondi et surtout… définitif ! Prenez-en conscience“, a martelé Lucile Falgeyrac lors de l’ouverture du séminaire sur l’ALECA, organisé par le FTDES en partenariat avec la Fondation Friedrich Ebert et l’ONG belge CNCD. -
22-Oct-2018 Webmanagercenter
Les céréales, lait et viande, filières les plus menacées par l’ALECA, selon le FTDES
Les céréales, le lait et la viande sont les trois premières filières qui seront directement touchées et menacées par une ouverture totale prévue par l’Accord de libre-échange complet et approfondi (ALECA) entre l’UE et la Tunisie. -
22-Oct-2018 Politis
Refusons l’accord commercial avec le Japon (Jefta)
Climaticide, écocide et dérégulateur : la bataille contre le Jefta ne fait que commencer, explique ce collectif de députés européens -
21-Oct-2018 Huffington Post
Liberals should consistently fight trade deals that let corporations sue Canada
Investor-state dispute settlement was tempered in the USMCA, but the government needs to justify why it persists asking for it in other agreements. -
20-Oct-2018 Rabble.ca
Challenging the far right’s nationalist opposition to free trade deals
Extreme right-wing, anti-immigration and Islamophobic parties tend to oppose so-called "free trade" agreements. -
19-Oct-2018 IGJ
BIT Indonesia-Singapore: "Indonesia Sovereignty is Threatened by the Foreign Investor Lawsuit"
Indonesian Civil Society, urge the Government not to ratify the recently signed Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with Singapore said it will threatens the state’s sovereignty. Besides signing the BIT, Indonesia-Singapore also signed MoU on Investment Cooperation for sectors such as Industry 4.0, tourism, financial technology, and education. -
19-Oct-2018 Antara News
Walhi: "Indonesia not for sale"
Aktivis Walhi Sumsel bersama jaringan lainnya melakukan aksi merespon, agenda perundingan ekonomi Indonesia-Uni Eropa (IEU CEPA) putaran ke-6 di Palembang pada 15-19 Oktober, dengan menyatakan ’Indonesia Not For Sale’.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.
Comment on this article