Financial Express - 10 December 2019
RCEP did not adequately address India’s concerns, will review trade deal with ASEAN: Govt in Rajya Sabha
The RCEP did not "adequately" address India’s concerns over issues like non-tariff barriers to trade and opaqueness in subsidy regime in some countries, which forced it to back out from the trade deal, the government informed Rajya Sabha on Tuesday.
The RCEP did not “adequately” address India’s concerns over issues like non-tariff barriers to trade and opaqueness in subsidy regime in some countries, which forced it to back out from the trade deal, the government informed Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. Besides, the government is also going to review the free trade agreement between India and ASEAN countries by the previous governments as it has created trade imbalances, Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal said in a statement. According to the minister, imports from these countries have increased much more than exports from India.
“The government’s priority is also to correct the asymmetry in the existing agreements and maximise its export potential to benefit domestic industry and farmers to promote Prime Minister’s vision of Make in India and doubling farmers’ income,” said Goyal. The minister also said that India would continue to engage with other countries as “equal partner and on the principle of reciprocity”. “We are working with our existing FTA partners like South Korea and Japan to address our concerns,” said Goyal in his statement on trade agreements with RCEP countries.
He further added: “We have also secured an agreement to to initiate a review of ASEAN-India Trade and Goods Agreement to make the AIFTA more user friendly simple and trade facilitative.” Over RCEP, the minister said that India continued to focus on its core demand as – level playing field, fair trade practises, transparency and market access – during the trade negotiations. “Any trade deal like RCEP must consider that countries have very different sizes and population, unequal levels of economic development and human development indicators, contrasting levels of prosperity, investment capacity, cultural diversity and significantly different political and judicial systems,” he said.