- About
- About bilaterals.org
-
Announcements
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- Help
- How to participate
- Negotiations
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
- Links




Croatia waiting for ICSID ruling in case brought by Hungary’s MOL
posted 7-February-2019
Total Croatia News | 6 February 2019
Croatia waiting for ICSID ruling in case brought by Hungary’s MOL
ZAGREB, February 6, 2019 - Arbitration proceedings which the Hungarian energy group MOL has launched against Croatia before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in Washington are still ongoing and a ruling is pending, and Croatia has contested the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal in Washington in all arbitration proceedings initiated against it based on investment protection agreements with EU member states or the Energy Charter Treaty, the government said in response to a query from Hina on Wednesday.
MOL launched arbitration proceedings before the ICSID in late 2013, arguing that Croatia had failed to honour its commitments from the main agreement on gas business and its annexes. The Hungarian company is demanding about US$1 billion in damages.
At the four hearings that were held, Croatia presented its arguments denying that with its discriminatory, arbitrary and non-transparent actions it had caused damage to MOL’s investment in the Croatian oil and gas company INA, and expressed expectations that its arguments would be taken into account, the government said.
The government stressed that MOL did not suffer any damage and that it was in fact the Croatian state that was adversely affected by agreements that were the result of corruption. "The hearings before the arbitration tribunal were completed in July 2018 and now we are awaiting a ruling. This process can take a year or more, given its complexity. At this stage of the process, we cannot divulge any more details," the government said.
The government recalled that Croatia had adopted the EU declaration on the legal consequences of the judgement of the Court of Justice in the Achmea case and on investment protection in the European Union, under which courts outside the EU cannot have jurisdiction over investment disputes between member states. "Consequently, in all arbitration proceedings that have been launched against Croatia based on investment protection agreements with EU member states or the Energy Charter Treaty objections were raised to the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal in Washington," the government said.
Last month, all EU member states undertook to terminate bilateral investment protection agreements signed between them, and 22 of them committed to ensure that the Energy Charter Treaty could not be used as a basis for arbitration following the Court of Justice judgment of March 2018. The judgment concerned a lawsuit brought by the Dutch insurance company Achmea against Slovakia.
The European Commission said at the time that "the dispute settlement mechanisms provided in these treaties as well as their intra-EU application of the Energy Charter Treaty are incompatible with EU law and discriminate between EU investors."
The Commission welcomed the fact that "the majority of member states committed to undertake action to ensure that the Energy Charter Treaty cannot be used as a basis for arbitration between investors and EU member states."
However, Hungary is not among the majority of member states that took on these commitments. Its permanent representative to the EU signed a separate statement saying that the Hungarian government will terminate all bilateral investment protection agreements with other member states either through a multilateral agreement or bilaterally. Hungary maintains that the Achmea judgment concerns only bilateral investment protection agreements and not the arbitration clause in the Energy Charter Treaty.
In addition to MOL’s action, Croatia is faced with another seven ongoing arbitration cases that have been brought against it before the UCSID, including lawsuits brought by four banks over the conversion of loans denominated in Swiss francs into euros.
We have experienced problems with sending the weekly newsletter and we have been working to resolve the issue
News from the movements
-
18-Feb-2019 No al TTIP
Declaración de la sociedad civil europea sobre las negociaciones comerciales entre la UE y los EE.UU.
Un tratado comercial de la UE con Trump socavaría los compromisos internacionales sobre el clima. -
18-Feb-2019 Friends of the Earth Europe
EU trade with Trump would undermine international climate commitments
Three years ago, widespread protests took place across Europe against a planned trade deal between the EU and the US. It was eventually halted. EU governments are now planning to agree terms to start negotiating a new transatlantic trade deal. -
12-Feb-2019 Le Monde
« Les droits des investisseurs ne doivent pas être mieux protégés que ceux des citoyens ou de la planète »
27 associations, syndicats et ONG appellent les députés européens à rejeter un projet d’accord commercial entre l’UE et Singapour, comparable au très contesté CETA. -
11-Feb-2019 OMAL
Euskal Herria se planta ante los tratados comerciales
Proponemos una serie de líneas de actuación para que las administraciones vascas hagan frente a los principales dispositivos de los tratados. -
7-Feb-2019 Biodiversidad en América Latina
Tratados de Libre Comercio: Instrumentos de desvío de poder que sojuzgan el Derecho
Este cuaderno de trabajo contiene fragmentos de textos, testimonios y entrevistas para repensar los efectos de los tratados de libre comercio y señalar sus nocivos efectos sobre la soberanía política, social económica y jurídica de las naciones. -
6-Feb-2019 M4
Organizaciones denuncian demanda de compañía minera estadounidense contra Guatemala y expresan su solidaridad con las comunidades que defienden la tierra y la vida en “La Puya”
Nos unimos en solidaridad con los residentes de San Pedro Ayampuc y San José del Golfo, quienes están profundamente preocupados por la grave amenaza que la mina representa para los suministros de agua, los ecosistemas y la calidad de vida en el área. -
6-Feb-2019 Stop ISDS
Sued for existing – ancient Romanian town on the frontline of the battle against ISDS
Today, the 6th of February 2019, the Romanian town of Roşia Montană celebrates its 1888th year of existence. Over the past 20 years, residents have fought against a proposed multi-billion dollar mining project. -
6-Feb-2019 Seattle to Brussels Network
Support the joint letter on the future of ISDS – EU-Singapore IPA vote
Civil society organisations urge Member of the European Parliament to not ratify EU - Singapore Investment Protection Agreement
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.
Comment on this article