- About
- About bilaterals.org
-
Announcements
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- Help
- How to participate
- Negotiations
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
- Links




PACER-Plus trade deal without PNG and Fiji a bad deal
posted 20-April-2017
AFTINET | 20 April 2017
PACER-Plus trade deal without PNG and Fiji a bad deal
AFTINET Convener Dr Patricia Ranald said today that Australia should not proceed with the PACER-Plus trade deal between Australia, New Zealand and only 12 of the original 14 Pacific Island countries. The deal was finalised in Brisbane today, and may be formally signed in June.
Dr Ranald said the two largest economies, Papua New Guinea and Fiji, have both refused to endorse the final text, saying it did not recognise their need to develop their infant industries. Without them, PACER-Plus has failed as a regional agreement.
“PNG and Fiji’s rejection shows that the agreement is heavily skewed towards the interests of Australia and New Zealand - despite early rhetoric that the agreement was about development needs,” said Dr Ranald.
The negotiations have been conducted in secret but leaked documents revealed many issues of concern to Pacific Island civil society groups. These are detailed in a recent report by the Pacific Network on Globalisation: Defending Pacific ways of life: A People’s Social Impact Assessment of PACER-Plus”.
Dr Ranald said that the smaller economies in the Pacific have less negotiating power than Fiji and PNG, and that the Australian and New Zealand governments should not be pressuring vulnerable economies into a deal which does not benefit them.
Pacific Island countries already have tariff-free access for their goods in Australia, so they get no extra market access. The main purpose of PACER-Plus is to reduce tariffs on Pacific Island imports from Australia and New Zealand and to reduce the ability of governments to regulate foreign investment in services and other sectors.
“Tariff reductions would lead to significant revenue losses for smaller Pacific Island countries, which could impact on the ability of these governments to provide essential services to their populations,” said Dr Ranald.
“Trade-in-services rules could also create pressure for privatisation and reduce the ability of governments to regulate to provide equitable access to essential services for vulnerable populations.
“Pacific Island governments should not be pressured to sign an agreement that is not in the interests of their peoples”.
Contact Dr Patricia Ranald 0419 695 841
We have experienced problems with sending the weekly newsletter and we have been working to resolve the issue
News from the movements
-
22-Feb-2019 Resilience
Tosepan: Resistance and renewal in Mexico
Mexico has signed 12 free trade agreements with 44 nations and 28 bilateral investment treaties. The grim consequences of globalization in Mexico are by now familiar and yet, throughout Mexico, there is a florescence of inspiring resistance and alternatives. -
22-Feb-2019 Attac
Rouvrir les négociations commerciales avec Trump saperait les engagements internationaux en matière de climat
Il y a trois ans, de vastes protestations ont eu lieu dans toute l’Europe contre le projet d’accord commercial entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis (TAFTA) qui a finalement été stoppé. Les gouvernements de l’UE envisagent désormais de se mettre d’accord pour négocier un nouvel accord. -
18-Feb-2019 No al TTIP
Declaración de la sociedad civil europea sobre las negociaciones comerciales entre la UE y los EE.UU.
Un tratado comercial de la UE con Trump socavaría los compromisos internacionales sobre el clima. -
18-Feb-2019 Friends of the Earth Europe
EU trade with Trump would undermine international climate commitments
Three years ago, widespread protests took place across Europe against a planned trade deal between the EU and the US. It was eventually halted. EU governments are now planning to agree terms to start negotiating a new transatlantic trade deal. -
12-Feb-2019 Le Monde
« Les droits des investisseurs ne doivent pas être mieux protégés que ceux des citoyens ou de la planète »
27 associations, syndicats et ONG appellent les députés européens à rejeter un projet d’accord commercial entre l’UE et Singapour, comparable au très contesté CETA. -
11-Feb-2019 OMAL
Euskal Herria se planta ante los tratados comerciales
Proponemos una serie de líneas de actuación para que las administraciones vascas hagan frente a los principales dispositivos de los tratados. -
7-Feb-2019 Biodiversidad en América Latina
Tratados de Libre Comercio: Instrumentos de desvío de poder que sojuzgan el Derecho
Este cuaderno de trabajo contiene fragmentos de textos, testimonios y entrevistas para repensar los efectos de los tratados de libre comercio y señalar sus nocivos efectos sobre la soberanía política, social económica y jurídica de las naciones. -
6-Feb-2019 M4
Organizaciones denuncian demanda de compañía minera estadounidense contra Guatemala y expresan su solidaridad con las comunidades que defienden la tierra y la vida en “La Puya”
Nos unimos en solidaridad con los residentes de San Pedro Ayampuc y San José del Golfo, quienes están profundamente preocupados por la grave amenaza que la mina representa para los suministros de agua, los ecosistemas y la calidad de vida en el área.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.
Comment on this article